Sitzer Settlement

A new legal filing could blow a $1 billion hole in the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) landmark settlement over buyer agent commissions, and set off a legal and financial chain reaction the industry hasn’t truly reckoned with.

Last week, Tanya Monestier, a law professor and class member in the Sitzer/Burnett case, filed her reply brief in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. Her aim? To convince the court to vacate the settlement that promised modest payouts to home sellers and minor rule tweaks by NAR. Based on her arguments, she may have a real shot.

Read More

Law professor and home seller Tanya Monestier has filed an appeal to overturn the Sitzer/Burnett commission lawsuit settlement. She argues the deal gives sellers almost nothing—about 0.1% of their damages—while leaving the commission system largely intact. If the court agrees, the entire $1.8 billion+ settlement could be thrown out, reopening the litigation and undoing all the current rule changes. Her brief is below for anyone who wants to dig into the details.

When Tanya Monestier first objected to the Sitzer/Burnett settlement last fall, I wrote that her critique exposed the uncomfortable truth: this deal might look good on paper, but in practice, it’s left most sellers just as stuck in the old system as before. Now, she’s doubled down with a formal brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit—and she’s aiming not just to revise the settlement, but to throw it out entirely.

Read More